everything.study
SEM 659

Technology Strategy and Innovation

3 units

Winter 2026

Readings

  • Harvard Business School Publishing Back Bay Battery simulation. In this component
    required
  • The materials for this course are all available digitally through Canvas, the University of Alberta libraries (WEB) or through the Harvard Business School Press (HBSP). Every effort has been made to provide current links to the electronic sources in a way that is consistent with the University of Alberta’s copyright
    required
Winter 2025

Topics

  • To introduce and apply major concepts and frameworks in technology strategy and innovation
  • To improve your ability to work in teams to identify and evaluate early-stage innovation

Readings

  • Intellectual Property and University Innovation o (2015) A Question of Utility: Intellectual Property, The Economist. WEB o Briggs, A.R. and Jennings, J. (2013) Uplifting the Whole People: The Impact of University of Alberta Alumni through Innovation and Entrepreneurship eClass
    recommended
  • Hodgson, L. (2018) A Day in the Life of a VC Investor. Pitchbook, November. WEB
    recommended
  • Levy, S. (2021) How Y Combinator Changed the World. Wired, December. WEB
    recommended
  • Feld, B. (2013) Venture Deals. Hoboken, NJ. Chapter 1, p. 5-29. eClass
    recommended
  • o Kerr, W.R., Nanda, R. and McQuade, J. (2014) Entrepreneurship Reading: Financing. CASE: Siegel, R. and Kissick, R. Pear VC (2017). HBSP
    recommended
  • Teece, D.J. (1986) Profiting from Technological Innovation: Implications for Integration,
    recommended
  • Collaboration, Licensing and Public Policy. Research Policy. 15(6): 285-305. eClass
    recommended
  • Roberts, E.B., and Berry, C.A. (1985). Entering New Businesses: Selecting Strategies for Success. Sloan Management Review, 26 (3): 3-17. WEB
    recommended
  • Grindley, P.C. and Teece, D.J. (1997) Managing Intellectual Capital: Licensing and Cross- Licensing in Semiconductors and Electronics. California Management Review. 39(2):8-41. WEB o Dyer, J.H., Prashant, K. and Singh, H. (2004) When to Ally & When to Acquire. Harvard Business Review. 82(7/8): 108-115. eClass CASE: Shih, W., Pisano, G.P. and King, A. (2008) Radical Collaboration: IBM Microelectronics Joint Development Alliances. HBSP
    recommended
  • Diamond (1997) The Curse of QWERTY. Discover Magazine. WEB
    recommended
  • Ransdell, E. (1999) Network Effects. Fast Company, August. WEB
    recommended
  • Thiel, P. (2014) Zero to One: Notes on Startups and How to Build the Future. New York, NY: Crown Publishing Group. Chapter 14, p. 173-189. eClass
    recommended
  • Vance, A. (2015) Elon Musk: Tesla, SpaceX and the Quest for a Fantastic Future. New York, NY: HarperCollins. Chapter 11, p. 317-359. eClass
    recommended
  • Carreyrou, J. (2018) Bad Blood: Secrets and Lies in a Silicon Valley Startup. New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf. Chapter 11, p. 3-17. eClass CASE: Bartlett, C. A., Khanna, T., and Choudhury, P. (2010) Genzyme’s CSR Dilemma: How to Play its HAND. HBSP
    recommended
  • Back Bay Battery is a simulation offered by Harvard Business School Press. It is based on a classic management dilemma: do managers focus on investing in existing technologies and risk being displaced by new technologies, or do they focus on investing in new technologies and risk their existing markets? The Back Bay Battery simulation mimics this management dilemma very well
    recommended
  • Each team will evaluate ALL businesses using the simple scale developed in Maxwell et al. (2009) “Business angle early stage decision making.” This scale (a template will be provided) was developed from the literature for evaluation of the “Dragon’s Den’ TV show data and may or may not capture all that is needed for the plans. Each team must compile full “Report Card” for all the plans
    recommended
Sources