everything.study
BUSINESS B795

Research Issues: Organizational Behaviour and Organizational Theory

Graduate

Fall 2022

Topics

  • organizational behaviour
  • organizational theory
  • research design
  • conflict
  • entrepreneurship

Readings

  • Wang, G., & Hackett, R. D. (2016). Conceptualization and measurement of virtuous leadership: Doing well by doing good. Journal of Business Ethics, 137(2), 321-345.
    See source
  • Antonakis, J., Bastardoz, N., Jacquart, P., & Shamir, B. (2016). Charisma: An ill-defined and ill-measured gift. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 3, 293-319.
    See source
  • Berson, Y., Halevy, N., Shamir, B., & Erez, M. (2015). Leading from different psychological distances: A construal-level perspective on vision communication, goal setting, and follower motivation. The Leadership Quarterly, 26(2), 143-155.
    See source
  • Carton, A. M. (2022). The Science of Leadership: A Theoretical Model and Research Agenda. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 9, 61-93.
    See source
  • D’innocenzo, L., Mathieu, J.E., & Kukenberger, M.R. (2016). A meta-analysis of different forms of shared leadership-team performance relations. Journal of Management, 42:7, 1964-1991.
    See source
  • Zhang, Y., Waldman, D. A., Han, Y. L., & Li, X. B. (2015). Paradoxical leader behaviors in people management: Antecedents and consequences. Academy of Management Journal, 58(2), 538-566.
    See source
  • Torka, A. K., Mazei, J., & Hueffmeier, J. (2021). Together, everyone achieves more—or, less? An interdisciplinary meta-analysis on effort gains and losses in teams. Psychological Bulletin, 147(5), 504-534.
    See source
  • Luciano, M. M., Nahrgang, J., & Shropshire, C. (2021). Strategic leadership systems: Viewing top management teams and boards of directors from a multiteam systems perspective. Academy of Management Review, 45(3), 675- 701.
    See source
  • Tasa, K., Sears, G. J., & Schat, A. C. (2011). Personality and teamwork behavior in context: The cross‐level moderating role of collective efficacy. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32(1), 65-85.
    See source
  • Barsade, Sigal G. (2002). “The Ripple Effect: Emotional Contagion and its Influence on Group Behavior.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 47, 644-675.
    See source
  • Haas, M. R. (2010). The double-edged swords of autonomy and external knowledge: Analyzing team effectiveness in a multinational organization. Academy of Management Journal, 53(5), 989-1008.
    See source
  • Lazar, M., Miron-Spektor, E., Agarwal, R., Erez, M., Goldfarb, B., & Chen, G. (2020). Entrepreneurial team formation. Academy of Management Annals, 14(1), 29-59.
    See source
  • Barsade, Sigal G &, O'Neill Olivia A. (2014). "What’s Love Got to do with It?: The Influence of a Culture of Companionate Love and Employee and Client Outcomes in a Long-term Care Setting,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 59, 551-598.
    See source
  • Zou, X. et al. (2009). Culture as common sense: Perceived consensus versus personal beliefs as mechanisms of cultural influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97: 579-597.
    See source
  • Schneider, B., Ehrhart, M. G., & Macey, W. H. (2013). Organizational climate and culture. Annual review of psychology, 64, 361-388.
    See source
  • Oreg, S., Bartunek, J. M., Lee, G., & Do, B. (2018). An affect-based model of recipients’ responses to organizational change events. Academy of Management Review, 43(1), 65-86.
    See source
  • Venus, M., Stam, D., & Van Knippenberg, D. (2019). Visions of change as visions of continuity. Academy of Management Journal, 62(3), 667-690.
    See source
  • Stouten, J., Rousseau, D. M., & De Cremer, D. (2018). Successful organizational change: Integrating the management practice and scholarly literatures. Academy of Management Annals, 12(2), 752-788.
    See source
  • Lüscher, L. S., & Lewis, M. W. (2008). Organizational change and managerial sensemaking: Working through paradox. Academy of Management Journal, 51(2), 221-240.
    See source
  • Oreg, S., Vakola, M., & Armenakis, A. (2011). Change recipients’ reactions to organizational change: A 60-year review of quantitative studies. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 47(4), 461-524.
    See source
  • Tensions, Research in Organizational Behavior, 36, 157-183. Creativity, and Innovation Harvey, S., & Rietzschel, E. F. (2022). Unpacking “Ideas” in Creative Work: A October 6 Multidisciplinary Review. Academy of Management Annals, 16(2), 621-656.
    See source
  • Miron-Spektor, E., Ingram, A., Keller, J., Smith, W. K., & Lewis, M. W. (2018). Microfoundations of organizational paradox: The problem is how we think about the problem. Academy of Management Journal, 61(1), 26-45.
    See source
  • Grant, A. M., & Berry, J. W. (2011). The necessity of others is the mother of invention: Intrinsic and prosocial motivations, perspective taking, and creativity.
    See source
  • Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580-607.
    See source
  • Putnam, L. L., Fairhurst, G. T., & Banghart, S. (2016). Contradictions, dialectics, and paradoxes in organizations: A constitutive approach. Academy of Management Annals, 10(1), 65-171.
    See source
  • Lindebaum, D., & Zundel, M. (2013). Not quite a revolution: Scrutinizing organizational neuroscience in leadership studies. Human Relations, 66(6), 857- 877.
    See source
  • Gordon, I., & Berson, Y. (2018). Oxytocin modulates charismatic influence in groups. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 147(1), 132-138.
    See source
  • Becker, W. J., Cropanzano, R., & Sanfey, A. G. (2011). Organizational neuroscience: Taking organizational theory inside the neural black box. Journal of Management, 37(4), 933-961.
    See source
  • Kosinski, M., Wang, Y., Lakkaraju, H., & Leskovec, J. (2016). Mining big data to extract patterns and predict real-life outcomes. Psychological Methods, 21(4), 493-506.
    See source
  • Barley, S. R., & Kunda, G. 2001. Bringing work back in. Organization Science, 12(1), 76-95.
    See source
  • Hinings, C. R., & Greenwood, R. 2002. Disconnects and consequences in organization theory? Administrative Science Quarterly, 411-421.
    See source
  • Luker, K. (2008). What is this a case of, anyway? In Kristen Luker, Salsa Dancing in the Social Sciences, Research in an age of Info-Glut. Boston, Harvard Univ. Press, pp. 51-75.
    See source
  • Tourish, D. (2020). The triumph of nonsense in management studies. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 19(1), 99- 109.
    See source
  • Dynamics, Identity, and Entrepreneurship in Satellite Radio, 1990-2005. Administrative Science Quarterly, 55, 439-471.
    See source
  • Roulet, Thomas. 2020. The Power of Being Divisive: Understanding Negative Social Evaluations, Stanford University Press: Stanford.
    See source
  • Image, Emotion and the European Migration Crisis. AMJ, 0,
    See source
Sources