9.46
Neuroscience of Morality
Fall 2017
How do we decide whether an action is morally wrong? How do we choose to do what is right? When and why do we punish wrong-doers? Moral behavior and moral evaluation are functions of the human brain. It is just becoming possible to use neuroscientific methods to understand how they work. This course will consider the mechanisms of morality as a question for neuroscientists.
Readings
- session: 1: Introduction · reading: No Readings
- Sato, Nobuya, Ling Tan, Kazushi Tate, and Maya Okada. “Rats Demonstrate Helping Behavior Toward a Soaked Conspecific.” Animal Cognition 18, no. 5 (2015): 1039-1047.
- session: 6: Essay Workshop · reading: No Readings
- Waytz, Adam, Ravi Iyer, Liane Young, and Jesse Graham. “Ideological Differences in the Expanse of Empathy.” Social Psychology of Political Polarization (2016): 61.
- session: 12: Essay Workshop · reading: No readings
- Gino, Francesca, Michael I. Norton, and Roberto A. Weber. “Motivated Bayesians: Feeling Moral While Acting Egoistically.” The Journal of Economic Perspectives 30, no. 3 (2016): 189-212.
- session: 15: Science and Morality · reading: No readings
- Greene, Joshua D. “The Cognitive Neuroscience of Moral Judgment.” The Cognitive Neurosciences 4 (2009): 1-48.
- Sheskin, Mark, and Laurie Santos. “The Evolution of Morality: Which Aspects of Human Moral Concerns are Shared with Nonhuman Primates.” The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Evolutionary Psychology 13 (2012).
Sources
- Course catalogue ↗Historical OpenCourseWare
- MIT OCW calendar ↗
- MIT OCW syllabus ↗
- MIT OCW readings ↗
- Historical MIT OpenCourseWare offering. Named reading entries and schedule topics are automatically extracted from the linked source pages.