everything.study
PSYC 400

Teaching and Learning in Psychology

6.00 units · Undergraduate

Fall 2025 · Applied Research in Higher Education

Topics

  • Learning

Readings

  • Required: Course Textbooks Edition(s) Publisher
  • Listed material: Due 1 (Class Sept 8) Welcome!
  • Listed material: Norris, M. E. (2024). Philosophies about learning and the practices that follow. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne, 65(2), 93. https://doi.org/10.1037/cap0000392
  • Listed material: Responses/Discussi on Leader due Thursday, 9pm
Fall 2024 · Applied Research in Higher Education

Topics

  • Learning

Readings

  • Listed material: Responses/Discu ssion Leader Responses, Sunday 9pm
  • Listed material: Lilienfeld, S. O. (2012). Public skepticism of psychology: Why many people perceive the study of human behavior as unscientific. American Psychologist, 67(2), 111–129. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023963 LoSchiavo, F. M., Shatz, M. A., & Poling, D. A. (2008). Strengthening the scholarship of teaching and learning via experimentation. Teaching of Psychology, 35(4), 301-304. https://doi.org/10.1080/00986280802377164 Kember, D. (2003). To control or not to control: The question of whether experimental designs are appropriate for evaluating teaching innovations in higher education. Learning styles: Concepts and evidence. Psychological science in the public interest, 9(3), 105-119. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539- 6053.2009.01038.x
  • Listed material: Butler, M. (2024). Financing Canadian colleges and universities in the 21st century. In M. E. Norris and S. M. Smith (Eds.), Leading the Way: Envisioning the Future of Higher Education. Kingston, ON: Queen’s University, eCampus Ontario. Licensed under CC BY 4.0. Retrieved from https://ecampusontario.pressbooks.pub/futureofhighereducation/chapt er/financing-canadian-colleges-and-universities/ Penny Thompson Thomson, P. (2019). Chapter 3: Cognitive Theories of Learning, Foundations of Educational Technology. https://open.library.okstate.edu/foundationsofeducationaltechnology/c hapter/3-cognitive-theories-of-learning/ Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., Marsh, E. J., Nathan, M. J., & Willingham ,D. T. (2013). Improving Students’ Learning With Effective Learning Techniques: Promising Directions From Cognitive and Educational Psychology. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 14(1), 4–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100612453266 Stockard, J., Wood, T. W., Coughlin, C., & Rasplica Khoury, C. (2018). The effectiveness of direct instruction curricula: A meta- analysis of a half century of research. Review of educational research, 88(4), 479-507. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654317751919
  • Listed material: Vogel-Walcutt, J. J., Gebrim, J. B., Bowers, C., Carper, T. M., & Nicholson, D. (2011). Cognitive load theory vs. constructivist approaches: Which best leads to efficient, deep learning? Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(2), 133-145. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00381.x
  • Listed material: Karpicke, J. D. (2017). Retrieval-based learning: A decade of progress. In J. T. Wixted (Ed.), Cognitive psychology of memory, Vol. 2 of Learning and memory: A comprehensive reference (J. H. Byrne, Series Ed.) (pp. 487-514). Oxford: Academic Press. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED599273.pdf Tuovinen, J. E., Sweller, J., Tuovinen, J. E., & Sweller, J. (1999). A comparison of cognitive load associated with discovery learning and worked examples. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(2), 334- 341. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.91.2.334 Oppenheimer, D. M. (2008). The secret life of fluency. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(6), 237–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2008.02.014
  • Listed material: https://www.learningscientists.org/ https://www.ted.com/talks/sugata_mitra_kids_can_teach_thems elves?language=en
  • Listed material: Curşeu, P. L., & Pluut, H. (2013). Student groups as learning entities: The effect of group diversity and teamwork quality on groups' cognitive complexity. Studies in Higher Education, 38(1), 87-103. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.565122 Springer, L., Stanne, M. E., & Donovan, S. S. (1999). Effects of small- group learning on undergraduates in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology: A meta-analysis. Review of educational research, 69(1), 21-51. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543069001021
  • Listed material: Michaelsen, L. K., & Sweet, M. (2008). The essential elements of team-based learning. New directions for teaching and learning, 2008(116), 7-27. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.330
  • Listed material: Joordens, S., & Kaur, I. (2024). Re-imagining education for an uncertain future: Can technology help us become more human? In M. E. Norris and S. M. Smith (Eds.), Leading the Way: Envisioning the Future of Higher Education. Kingston, ON: Queen’s University, eCampus Ontario. Licensed under CC BY 4.0. Retrieved from https://ecampusontario.pressbooks.pub/futureofhighereducation/chapt er/re-imagining-education-for-an-uncertain-future-can-technology- help-us-become-more-human/ Stinson, C. (2024). What are large language models made of? In M. E. Norris and S. M. Smith (Eds.), Leading the Way: Envisioning the Future of Higher Education. Kingston, ON: Queen’s University, eCampus Ontario. Licensed under CC BY 4.0. Retrieved from https://ecampusontario.pressbooks.pub/futureofhighereducation/chapt er/what-are-large-language-models-made-of/
  • Listed material: Szpunar, K. K., McDermott, K. B., & Roediger, H. L. (2007). Expectation of a final cumulative test enhances long-term retention. Memory & Cognition, 35(5), 1007–1013. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193473 Dewsbury, B. M., Swanson, H. J., Moseman-Valtierra, S., & Caulkins, J. (2022). Inclusive and active pedagogies reduce academic outcome gaps and improve long-term performance. Plos one, 17(6), e0268620. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0268620
  • Listed material: Crouch, C., Fagen, A. P., Callan, J. P., & Mazur, E. (2004). Classroom demonstrations: Learning tools or entertainment? American Journal of Physics, 72(6), 835-838. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1707018
  • Listed material: Restoule, J. P., Mashford-Pringle, A., Chacaby, M., Smillie, C., Brunette, C., & Russel, G. (2013). Supporting successful transitions to post-secondary education for Indigenous students: Lessons from an institutional ethnography in Ontario, Canada. International Indigenous
  • Listed material: Heffernan, T. (2023). Abusive comments in student evaluations of courses and teaching: the attacks women and marginalised academics endure. Higher Education, 85(1), 225-239. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10734-022-00831-x
  • Listed material: Berk, R. A. (2018). Start spreading the news: Use multiple sources of evidence to evaluate teaching. The Journal of Faculty Development, 32(1), 73-81. https://www.schreyerinstitute.psu.edu/pdf/UseMultipleSourcesSRs_B erk_JFacDev1-11-2018.pdf Deslauriers, L., McCarty, L. S., Miller, K., Callaghan, K., & Kestin, G. (2019). Measuring actual learning versus feeling of learning in response to being actively engaged in the classroom. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(39), 19251–19257. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1821936116 Haladyna, T. M., Downing, S. M., & Rodriguez, M. C. (2002). A review of multiple-choice item-writing guidelines for classroom
Fall 2023 · Applied Research in Higher Education

Topics

  • Scholarship of teaching and learning
  • educational research methods
  • Indigenous research
  • cognitive models of learning
  • pedagogy
  • online and multimedia learning
  • teaching practice.

Readings

  • Please note: The reading list below may change if circumstances warrant. This is the plan, though! Any
  • changes will be communicated through onQ announcements and email. Please note all readings are in
  • onQ via FeedbackFruits. Inclusion in the reading list does not mean that these works are perfect—at this
  • level of scholarship, we will be discussing these papers. I encourage you to consider the concepts of
  • validity, reliability, generalizability, and ethics (VRGE) as you read. Looking forward to sharing some
  • important discussions this year!
  • W
  • e
  • ek
  • Topic(s)
  • Sept 5-
  • Welcome!!
  • This will be the one class where you will hear me talk a
  • lot : ) After this, you will get practice doing the talking. I
  • am excited to share this semester with you!
  • Sept
  • 11-17
  • Research
  • Methods in
  • Education
  • Datta, R. (2018). Decolonizing both researcher and
  • research and its effectiveness in Indigenous research.
  • Research Ethics, 14(2), 1-24.
  • Reading
  • Responses
  • due 9am
  • Monday in
  • Feedback
  • Fruits (to
  • be used in
  • class
  • Thursday);
  • Teaching
  • Philosophy
  • 1 due
  • September
  • 15 2pm to
  • onQ
  • Lilienfeld, S. O. (2012). Public skepticism of
  • psychology: Why many people perceive the study of
  • human behavior as unscientific. American Psychologist,
  • 67(2), 111–129. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023963
  • LoSchiavo, F. M., Shatz, M. A., & Poling, D. A. (2008).
  • Strengthening the scholarship of teaching and learning
  • via experimentation. Teaching of Psychology, 35(4),
  • 301-304.
  • Kember, D. (2003). To control or not to control: The
  • question of whether experimental designs are
  • appropriate for evaluating teaching innovations in higher
  • education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher
  • Education, 28(1), 89-101.
  • Recommended but not required (book):
  • https://pressbooks.bccampus.ca/knowinghome/
  • 18-24
  • Beginning
  • Cognitive
  • Models of
  • Learning
  • Pashler, H., McDaniel, M., Rohrer, D., & Bjork, R.
  • (2008). Learning styles: Concepts and evidence.
  • Psychological science in the public interest, 9(3), 105-
  • 119.
  • Form
  • Triangles
  • Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., Marsh, E. J., Nathan, M.
  • J., & Willingham ,D. T. (2013). Improving Students’
  • Learning With Effective Learning Techniques:
  • Promising Directions From Cognitive and Educational
  • Psychology. Psychological Science in the Public
  • Interest, 14(1), 4–58.
  • https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100612453266
  • Penny Thompson Thomson, P. (2019). Chapter 3:
  • Cognitive Theories of Learning, Foundations of
  • Educational Technology.
  • https://open.library.okstate.edu/foundationsofeducational
  • technology/chapter/3-cognitive-theories-of-learning/
  • 25-Oct
  • (continued)
  • Siregar, N. R. (2021). Explicit Instruction and Executive
  • Functioning Capacity: A New Direction in Cognitive
  • Load Theory. Journal of Education, 002205742110332.
  • https://doi.org/10.1177/00220574211033256
  • Individual
  • Problem
  • Statement
  • due
  • Vogel-Walcutt, J. J., Gebrim, J. B., Bowers, C., Carper,
  • T. M., & Nicholson, D. (2011). Cognitive load theory vs.
  • constructivist approaches: Which best leads to efficient,
  • deep learning? Journal of Computer Assisted Learning,
  • 27(2), 133-145.
  • 29, 2pm;
  • connect
  • with your
  • triangle
  • team!
  • Karpicke, J. D. (2017). Retrieval-based learning: A
  • decade of progress. In J. T. Wixted (Ed.), Cognitive
  • psychology of memory, Vol. 2 of Learning and memory:
  • A comprehensive reference (J. H. Byrne, Series Ed.) (pp.
  • 487-514). Oxford: Academic Press.
  • Tuovinen, J. E., Sweller, J., Tuovinen, J. E., & Sweller,
  • J. (1999). A comparison of cognitive load associated
  • with discovery learning and worked examples. Journal
  • of Educational Psychology, 91(2), 334- 341.
  • doi:10.1037/0022-0663.91.2.334
  • Oppenheimer, D. M. (2008). The secret life of fluency.
  • Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(6), 237–241.
  • https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2008.02.014
  • Oct 2-8
  • *DDQI
  • C*
  • Innovation in
  • Chew, S. L. (2021). An advance organizer for student
  • learning: Choke points and pitfalls in studying. Canadian
  • Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, No Pagination
  • Specified-No Pagination Specified.
  • https://doi.org/10.1037/cap0000290
  • Groups
  • being
  • formed in
  • class!
  • Guest
  • speaker
  • from
  • DDQIC;
  • Confirm
  • scheduling
  • teaching
  • **TEACHI
  • NG
  • The following are not for FeedbackFruits, but please
  • be sure to review them and take some notes for class
  • https://www.learningscientists.org/
  • https://www.ted.com/talks/sugata_mitra_kids_can_te
  • ach_thems elves?language=en
  • TRIANGL
  • ES**
  • Octobe
  • r 16-22
  • **
  • AWAY
  • CPR**
  • Have
  • teachin
  • g
  • triangl
  • es this
  • week
  • Science of
  • Group Work
  • (+ group work
  • time)
  • Davies, W. M. (2009). Groupwork as a form of
  • assessment: Common problems and recommended
  • solutions. Higher education, 58(4), 563-584.
  • Fruits; NO
  • FORMAL
  • CLASS.
  • Use this
  • time to
  • work on
  • your group
  • project
  • proposals!
  • Group
  • problem
  • statement
  • October 20,
  • 2pm; (quiz
  • in
  • PSYC100,
  • no teaching
  • triangles
  • this week)
  • Curşeu, P. L., & Pluut, H. (2013). Student groups as
  • learning entities: The effect of group diversity and
  • teamwork quality on groups' cognitive complexity.
  • Studies in Higher Education, 38(1), 87-103.
  • Springer, L., Stanne, M. E., & Donovan, S. S. (1999).
  • Effects of small- group learning on undergraduates in
  • science, mathematics, engineering, and technology: A
  • meta-analysis. Review of educational research, 69(1),
  • 21-51.
  • Michaelsen, L. K., & Sweet, M. (2008). The essential
  • elements of team-based learning. New directions for
  • teaching and learning, 2008(116), 7-27.
  • Oct 23-
  • 29 **
  • away
  • for
  • diversi
  • ty
  • trainin
  • g**
  • But…how to
  • increase
  • elaboration?
  • Christensen Hughes, J., & Eaton, S. E. (2022). Student
  • integrity violations in the academy: More than a decade
  • of growing complexity and concern. Academic integrity
  • in Canada: An enduring and essential challenge, 61-79.
  • is hoping to
  • run this
  • remotely,
  • but I will
  • be traveling
  • for a
  • Bradbury, N. A. (2016). Attention span during lectures:
  • 8 seconds, 10 minutes, or more? Advances in Physiology
  • Education, 40(4), 509– 513.
  • https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00109.2016
  • Szpunar, K. K., McDermott, K. B., & Roediger, H. L.
  • (2007). Expectation of a final cumulative test enhances
  • long-term retention. Memory & Cognition, 35(5), 1007–
  • 1013. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193473
  • unique
  • opportunity
  • diversity
  • training. If
  • I cannot
  • run the
  • there will
  • be a guest
  • speaker : )
  • Dewsbury, B. M., Swanson, H. J., Moseman-Valtierra,
  • S., & Caulkins, J. (2022). Inclusive and active
  • pedagogies reduce academic outcome gaps and improve
  • long-term performance. Plos one, 17(6), e0268620.
  • Crouch, C., Fagen, A. P., Callan, J. P., & Mazur, E.
  • (2004). Classroom demonstrations: Learning tools or
  • entertainment? American Journal of Physics, 72(6), 835-
  • 838.
  • r 30-
  • Novem
  • ber 5
  • Thinking
  • about EDI in
  • Higher Ed
  • Walton, G. M., & Cohen, G. L. (2011). A brief socialbelonging intervention improves academic and health
  • outcomes of minority students. Science, 331(6023),
  • 1447-1451.
  • Submit
  • feedback to
  • your peers!
  • Restoule, J. P., Mashford-Pringle, A., Chacaby, M.,
  • Smillie, C., Brunette, C., & Russel, G. (2013).
  • Supporting successful transitions to post-secondary
  • education for Indigenous students: Lessons from an
  • institutional ethnography in Ontario, Canada.
  • International Indigenous Policy Journal, 4(4).
  • Toutain, Christopher (2019). Barriers to
  • Accommodations for Students with Disabilities in
  • Higher Education: A Literature Review. Journal of
  • Postsecondary Education and Disability, 32 (3), 297-
  • 310.
  • Lovett, B. J., & Harrison, A. G. (2021). De-
  • Implementing Inappropriate Accommodations Practices.
  • Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 36(2), 115-126.
  • Scullin, M. K. (2019). The Eight Hour Sleep Challenge
  • During Final Exams Week. Teaching of Psychology,
  • 46(1), 55–63.
  • https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628318816142
  • ber 6-
  • Evaluating
  • Teaching and
  • Assessing for
  • Whether
  • Students
  • Learned
  • Wesp, R., & Miele, J. (2008). Student opinions of the
  • quality of teaching activities poorly predict pedagogical
  • effectiveness. Teaching of Psychology, 35(4), 360-362.
  • Triangle
  • Report due
  • November
  • 10, 2pm
  • Heffernan, T. (2023). Abusive comments in student
  • evaluations of courses and teaching: the attacks women
  • and marginalised academics endure. Higher Education,
  • 85(1), 225-239.
  • Berk, R. A. (2018). Start spreading the news: Use
  • multiple sources of evidence to evaluate teaching. The
  • Journal of Faculty Development, 32(1), 73-81.
  • Deslauriers, L., McCarty, L. S., Miller, K., Callaghan,
  • K., & Kestin, G. (2019). Measuring actual learning
  • versus feeling of learning in response to being actively
  • engaged in the classroom. Proceedings of the National
  • Academy of Sciences, 116(39), 19251–19257.
  • https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1821936116
  • Haladyna, T. M., Downing, S. M., & Rodriguez, M. C.
  • (2002). A review of multiple-choice item-writing
  • guidelines for classroom assessment. Applied
  • measurement in education, 15(3), 309-333.
  • Brothen, T. (2012). Time Limits on Tests: Updating the
  • 1-Minute Rule. Teaching of Psychology, 39(4), 288–
  • 292. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628312456630
  • 10 Novem
  • ber 13-
  • Online
  • Schrenk, N., Alves, K., Van Dam, D., & Schrenk, B.
  • (2021). Reflecting on best practices for online learning
  • in a Post-COVID-19 world. Online Learning, 25(4),
  • 486-504.
  • Fisher, M., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2021). Harder Than
  • You Think: How Outside Assistance Leads to
  • Overconfidence. Psychological Science, 32(4), 598–610.
  • https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620975779
  • Noetel, M., Griffith, S., Delaney, O., Sanders, T., Parker,
  • P., del Pozo Cruz, B., & Lonsdale, C. (2021). Video
  • improves learning in higher education: A systematic
  • review. Review of Educational Research, 91(2), 204-
  • 236.
  • Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2003). Nine ways to reduce
  • cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational
  • psychologist, 38(1), 43-52.
  • 11 Nov
  • 20-26
  • Presentation/P
  • itches
  • 12 Novem
  • ber 27-
  • Dec3
  • 2 Due
  • December
  • 5 2pm;
  • Final
  • Report Due
  • 5 2pm
Fall 2022 · Applied Research in Higher Education

Topics

  • Learning

Readings

  • Listed material: 1 Welcome!! This will be the one class where you will hear me talk a lot : ) After this, you will get practice doing the talking. I am excited to share this semester with you! 2 Research Methods in Education Datta, R. (2018). Decolonizing both researcher and research and its effectiveness in Indigenous research. Research Ethics, 14(2), 1-24. Lilienfeld, S. O. (2012). Public skepticism of psychology: Why many people perceive the study of human behavior as unscientific. American Psychologist, 67(2), 111–129. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023963 LoSchiavo, F. M., Shatz, M. A., & Poling, D. A. (2008). Strengthening the scholarship of teaching and learning via experimentation. Teaching of Psychology, 35(4), 301-304. Kember, D. (2003). To control or not to control: The question of whether experimental designs are appropriate for evaluating teaching innovations in higher education. Recommended but not required (book): https://pressbooks.bccampus.ca/knowinghome/ 3 Beginning Cognitive Models of Learning Pashler, H., McDaniel, M., Rohrer, D., & Bjork, R. (2008). Learning styles: Concepts and evidence. Psychological science in the public interest, 9(3), 105-119.
  • Listed material: Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., Marsh, E. J., Nathan, M. J., & Willingham, D. T. (2013). Improving Students’ Learning With Effective Learning Techniques: Promising Directions From Cognitive and Educational Psychology. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 14(1), 4–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100612453266 Siregar, N. R. (2021). Explicit Instruction and Executive Functioning Capacity: A New Direction in Cognitive Load Theory. Journal of Education, 002205742110332. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220574211033256 Vogel-Walcutt, J. J., Gebrim, J. B., Bowers, C., Carper, T. M., & Nicholson, D. (2011). Cognitive load theory vs. constructivist approaches: Which best leads to efficient, deep learning? Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(2), 133-145. 4 Cognitive Models of Learning (continued) Karpicke, J. D. (2017). Retrieval-based learning: A decade of progress. In J. T. Wixted (Ed.), Cognitive psychology of memory, Vol. 2 of Learning and memory: A comprehensive reference (J. H. Byrne, Series Ed.) (pp. 487-514). Oxford: Academic Press. Tuovinen, J. E., Sweller, J., Tuovinen, J. E., & Sweller, J. (1999). A comparison of cognitive load associated with discovery learning and worked examples. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(2), 334- 341. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.91.2.334 Oppenheimer, D. M. (2008). The secret life of fluency. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(6), 237–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2008.02.014 5 Innovation in Education Chew, S. L. (2021). An advance organizer for student learning: Choke points and pitfalls in studying. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, No Pagination Specified-No Pagination Specified [See source for the remaining reading list.]
  • Listed material: 6 Science of Group Work (+ group work time) Davies, W. M. (2009). Higher education, 58(4), 563-584. Curşeu, P. L., & Pluut, H. (2013). Student groups as learning entities: The effect of group diversity and teamwork quality on groups' cognitive complexity. Studies in Higher Education, 38(1), 87-103. Springer, L., Stanne, M. E., & Donovan, S. S. (1999). Effects of small- group learning on undergraduates in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology: A meta-analysis. Review of educational research, 69(1), 21-51. Michaelsen, L. K., & Sweet, M. (2008). The essential elements of team-based learning. New directions for teaching and learning, 2008(116), 7-27. 7 But...how to increase elaboration? Evidence for some common approaches Bradbury, N. A. (2016). Attention span during lectures: 8 seconds, 10 minutes, or more? Advances in Physiology Education, 40(4), 509– 513. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00109.2016 Guo, P. J., Kim, J., & Rubin, R. (2014). How video production affects student engagement: An empirical study of MOOC videos. Proceedings of the First ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale Conference, 41–50. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556325.2566239 Noetel, M., Griffith, S., Delaney, O., Sanders, T., Parker, P., del Pozo Cruz, B., & Lonsdale, C. (2021). Video improves learning in higher education: A systematic review. Review of Educational Research, 91(2), 204-236.
Fall 2021 · Applied Research in Higher Education

Topics

  • Learning

Readings

  • Listed material: Due Dat es 1 Welcome!!
  • Listed material: 2 Research Methods in Education Datta, R. (2018). Decolonizing both researcher and research and its effectiveness in Indigenous research. Research Ethics, 14(2), 1-24.
  • Listed material: Lilienfeld, S. O. (2012). Public skepticism of psychology: Why many people perceive the study of human behavior as unscientific. American Psychologist, 67(2), 111–129. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023963
  • Listed material: LoSchiavo, F. M., Shatz, M. A., & Poling, D. A. (2008). Strengthening the scholarship of teaching and learning via experimentation. Teaching of Psychology, 35(4), 301-304.
  • Listed material: Kember, D. (2003). To control or not to control: The question of whether experimental designs are appropriate for evaluating teaching innovations in higher education.
  • Recommended but not required (book): https://pressbooks.bccampus.ca/knowinghome/
  • Listed material: 3 Beginning Cognitive Models of Learning Pashler, H., McDaniel, M., Rohrer, D., & Bjork, R. (2008). Learning styles: Concepts and evidence. Psychological science in the public interest, 9(3), 105-119.
  • Listed material: Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., Marsh, E. J., Nathan, M. J., & Willingham, D. T. (2013). Improving Students’ Learning With Effective Learning Techniques: Promising Directions From Cognitive and Educational Psychology. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 14(1), 4–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100612453266
  • Listed material: Siregar, N. R. (2021). Explicit Instruction and Executive Functioning Capacity: A New Direction in Cognitive Load Theory. Journal of Education, 002205742110332. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220574211033256
  • Listed material: Vogel-Walcutt, J. J., Gebrim, J. B., Bowers, C., Carper, T. M., & Nicholson, D. (2011). Cognitive load theory vs. constructivist approaches: Which best leads to efficient, deep learning? Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(2), 133-145.
  • Listed material: 4 Cognitive Models of Learning (continued) Karpicke, J. D. (2017). Retrieval-based learning: A decade of progress. In J. T. Wixted (Ed.), Cognitive psychology of memory, Vol. 2 of Learning and memory: A comprehensive reference (J. H. Byrne, Series Ed.) (pp. 487-514). Oxford: Academic Press.
  • Listed material: Tuovinen, J. E., Sweller, J., Tuovinen, J. E., & Sweller, J. (1999). A comparison of cognitive load associated with discovery learning and worked examples. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(2), 334- 341. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.91.2.334
  • Listed material: Oppenheimer, D. M. (2008). The secret life of fluency. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(6), 237–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2008.02.014
  • Listed material: 5 Innovation in Education Chew, S. L. (2021). An advance organizer for student learning: Choke points and pitfalls in studying. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, No Pagination Specified-No Pagination Specified. https://doi.org/10.1037/cap0000290
  • Listed material: https://www.learningscientists.org/
  • Listed material: https://www.ted.com/talks/sugata_mitra_kids_can_teach_thems elves?language=en
  • Listed material: 6 Science of Group Work (+ group work time) Davies, W. M. (2009). Higher education, 58(4), 563-584.
  • Listed material: Curşeu, P. L., & Pluut, H. (2013). Student groups as learning entities: The effect of group diversity and teamwork quality on groups' cognitive complexity. Studies in Higher Education, 38(1), 87-103.
  • Listed material: Springer, L., Stanne, M. E., & Donovan, S. S. (1999). Effects of small-
2020 · Applied Research in Higher Education

Topics

  • Situating the scholarship of teaching and learning (Design a research study)
  • Cognitive models of Learning
  • Small group learning (Workshop on Team Based Learning)
  • Learning Styles (Universal Design for Learning)
  • Online learning/Instructional Design - best practices (Community Service
  • Learning)
  • Critical thinking
2019-2020 · Applied Research in Higher Education

Topics

  • Situating the scholarship of teaching and learning (Design a research study)
  • Cognitive models of Learning
  • Small group learning (Workshop on Team Based Learning)
  • Learning Styles (Universal Design for Learning)
  • On line learning/Instructional Design - best practices (Community Service
  • Learning)
  • Stress
Sources